I understand how it can be interpreted as snarky, but how could it have been written better? It's a hard path to walk and recruiting/interviewing is inherently sensitive it seems.
>If you optimize below 1487 cycles, beating Claude Opus 4.5's best performance at launch, email us at [email protected] with your code (and ideally a resume) so we can be appropriately impressed and perhaps discuss interviewing.
Not condescending
> If you optimize below 1487 cycles, beating Claude Opus 4.5's best performance at launch, email us at [email protected] with your code so we can schedule an interview.
The original
>If you optimize below 1487 cycles, beating Claude Opus 4.5's best performance at launch, email us at [email protected] with your code (and ideally a resume) so we can be appropriately impressed and perhaps discuss interviewing.
Not condescending
> If you optimize below 1487 cycles, beating Claude Opus 4.5's best performance at launch, email us at [email protected] with your code so we can schedule an interview.