Some feedback about the primary use case.

Your Lix doc (LLM written but with typos?) is sort of weird, handwaving how Lix does version control over, say, Excel, to say it's about working with SQL databases:

How does Lix work?

Lix adds a version control system on top of SQL databases that let's you query virtual tables like file, file_history, etc. via plain SQL. These table's are version controlled.

Then it gets weirder:

Why this matters:

Lix doesn't reinvent databases — durability, ACID, and corruption recovery are handled by battle-tested SQL databases.

This seems like a left turn from the value prop and why the value prop matters?

A firm-wide audit trail of changes to typically opaque file types (M365 files in particular) could be tremendously valuable -- and additive -- compared to the versioning that's baked into the file bundles. The version control is already embedded by the app, what adds value is reporting on or managing that from outside the app.

As for how it works, both in the docs and in the comment I'm replying to, it's unclear how any of this interacts with the native version control embedded in M365 apps or why this tool can be trusted as effective at tracking M365 content changes.