alt Hacker NewsIs it common for peer reviewers to check references? Somehow I thought they mostly focused on whether the experiment looked reasonable and the conclusions followed.
Is it common for peer reviewers to check references? Somehow I thought they mostly focused on whether the experiment looked reasonable and the conclusions followed.
In journal publications it is, but without DOIs it's difficult.
In conference publications, it's less common.
Conference publications (like NEURips) is treated as announcement of results, not verified.