logoalt Hacker News

gerdesjtoday at 12:42 AM3 repliesview on HN

"where we might as well save the bandwidth"

I come from a world (yesteryear) where a computer had 1KB of RAM (ZX80). I've used links with modems rocking 1200 bps (1200 bits per second). I recall US Robotics modems getting to speeds of 56K - well that was mostly a fib worse than MS doing QA these days. Ooh I could chat with some bloke from Novell on Compuserve.

In 1994ish I was asked to look into this fancy new world wide web thing on the internet. I was working at a UK military college as an IT bod, I was 24. I had a Windows 3.1 PC. I telnetted into a local VAX, then onto the X25 PAD. I used JANET to get to somewhere in the US (NIST) and from there to Switzerland to where this www thing started off. I was using telnet and WAIS and Gopher and then I was apparently using something called "www".

I described this www thing as "a bit wank", which shows what a visionary I am!


Replies

drzaiusx11today at 1:23 AM

Fellow old here, I had several 56k baud modems but even my USR (the best of the bunch) never got more than half way to 56k throughput. Took forever to download shit over BBS...

show 2 replies
queseratoday at 1:44 AM

> I've used links with modems rocking 1200 bps

Yo, 300 baud, checking in.

Do I hear 110?

+++ATH0

show 3 replies
bandramitoday at 5:25 AM

Same year, I tried this cool new "Mosaic" software and thought it was a cool proof of concept, but there was no way this web thing could ever displace gopher

show 1 reply