It is fine to have criticisms of this, I have many, but saying that Yegge hasn't built real software is just not true.
> saying that Yegge hasn't built real software is just not true
I mean... I feel like it's somewhat telling that his wikipedia page spends half its words on his abrasive communication style, and the only thing approximating a product mentioned is a (lost) Rails-on-Javascript port, and 25 years spent developing a MUD on the side.
Certainly one doesn't get to stay a staff-level engineer at Google without writing code - but in terms of real, shipping software, Yegge's resume is a bit light for his tenure in BigTech
Yegge obviously built real software in the past. He has not built real software wherein he never looked at the code, as he is now promoting.