that would turn it into a witch hunt drama post. it's good that this sort of thing wasn't included.
> it's good that this sort of thing wasn't included.
Is it good that the article has inspired mostly "the author is wrong" comments, more so than even the usual for HN?
> it's good that this sort of thing wasn't included.
Is it good that the article has inspired mostly "the author is wrong" comments, more so than even the usual for HN?