Your take: "He's trained to do exactly what he did."
Facts: He's actually trained not to do what he did (twice).
That's not what you quoted when you called it my take.
Now that you've got an actual take, I can respond:
He was trained to respond to deadly force with deadly force. That's what I'm talking about, the shooting. It was by the book.
Where he positions himself is about his own safety, nothing to do with whether he should pull the trigger or not.
He won't be found liable or guilty of anything.
alt Hacker News
That's not what you quoted when you called it my take.
Now that you've got an actual take, I can respond:
He was trained to respond to deadly force with deadly force. That's what I'm talking about, the shooting. It was by the book.
Where he positions himself is about his own safety, nothing to do with whether he should pull the trigger or not.
He won't be found liable or guilty of anything.