So the original post had this added to the top:
> This post was updated at 11:15 a.m. Pacific time to clarify that the use case described here is a proof of concept. Some sections have been updated for clarity.
But then the bottom still says:
> Our team is using Matrix on Workers, handling real encrypted communications. It is fast, it is cheap, and it is arguably one of the most secure ways to deploy a homeserver today.
Which one is it?
I guess they're dogfooding something that's wildly insecure and incomplete internally. Kind of surprising that's allowed on CloudFlare's internal network if true, but I guess shadow-IT is everywhere.
I don't believe "Our team is using Matrix on Workers." The repo is in someone's personal Github and a pretty incomplete and insecure implementation.