meh. I think it would have been more interesting had the author discussed more granular estimates. Mathematicians have narrowed it down more by considering the properties of the pieces and bijections.
Assuming you're referring to [0], that's a statistical estimate of valid chess positions (based on clever methods of uniform position sampling + fast validity testing), not valid chess games (based on estimating branching factors for very long games).
Assuming you're referring to [0], that's a statistical estimate of valid chess positions (based on clever methods of uniform position sampling + fast validity testing), not valid chess games (based on estimating branching factors for very long games).
[0] https://github.com/tromp/ChessPositionRanking