> A Trump-appointed Federal judge clearly did not find that excuse compelling.

A Trump-appointed judge set a hearing about a situation where he was told a US citizen was being deported. I would expect any judge to care about that, regardless of who appointed them. Because we don't actually deport US citizens, it turns out.

> The same org claimed Alex Pretti was an assassin who was attempting to massacre ICE, remember. They lie; that's a matter of public record.

The same org that is claiming what?

> https://nipnlg.org/...

They didn't allege in that document that it was coerced. They allege that they didn't give them enough options to contact family etc. She had an option to leave the child in the US.

> "the officer threatened Julia that Jade would be immediately sent to a foster home in the United States if Julia did not write a note stating that Jade would be deported to Honduras with her."

This shows that the child going to Honduras was a choice by the mother. Under duress? Sure, she's getting deported. Tough choice. But she made it, not the government.

> That's directly contradicted by your link; "the case was closed without a ruling on the merits".

No it's not. What, you think the judge never saw the piece of paper? You think active cases are closed without involving the judge?

> I have no difficulty at all finding this case; I replied to your comment about five minutes after you posted it.

Sure, but it didn't fit the criteria. This US citizen wasn't deported by the government. Their mother was, and she chose to take the child with her.