No.

I clearly state

> analogy (sorry about the initial misspell) when it comes to eventual consistency because 1: We use banking almost universally the same ways, and 2: we understand fully the eventual consistency employed (even though we don't think about it)

The point is, you understand that your bank account is eventually consistent, and I have given an explanation of instances of eventual consistency that you already usually know and understand.

You make the mistake of thinking about something else (the back end storage, the double entry bookeeping).