> Wolves don’t care if they are seen or not. Wolves are entirely focused on the self-selected essential project in front of them
The wolves analogy is simply wrong. Wolves work in packs.
I read those stereotypes as people phantasizing about being wild and free and a fierce (coding) biest, without actually knowing the wild. But it does have the effect on me to not being able to take it serious. If they don't even know basic facts about the animal they want to use as their metaphor, I expect way more to be wrong.
He's a furry, you insensitive clod!
Not all wolves work in packs.
Hint: think of the widespread expression used in terrorism debates: "Lone wolf". It's a self radicalized/motivated individual acting independently and alone.
lone wolf. maybe he missed the significance of lone in that phase when he heard it first and thought it could be dropped. That is my working assumption, it happens.
Whether or not the natural world has such wolves, its a fictional archetype.
It is a particularly common theme in Japanese fiction, where the deviation from the social hierarchy requires a stong force of individual will. Interesting it is also common in Japanese technology breakthrough documentaries.
Ogami Itto - Lone wolf and cub is the first thing that comes to mind when the author says wolf.