logoalt Hacker News

Floppinux – An Embedded Linux on a Single Floppy, 2025 Edition

130 pointsby GalaxySnailtoday at 4:33 AM82 commentsview on HN

Comments

sockbottoday at 5:28 AM

Over Christmas I tried to actually build a usable computer from the 32-bit era. Eventually I discovered that the problem isn't really the power of the computer. Computers have been powerful enough for productivity tasks for 20 years, excepting browser-based software.

The two main problems I ran into were 1) software support at the application layer, and 2) video driver support. There is a herculean effort on the part of package maintainers to build software for distros, and no one has been building 32 bit version of software for years, even if it is possible to build from source. There is only a very limited set of software you can use, even CLI software because so many things are built with 64 bit dependencies. Secondly, old video card drivers are being dropped from the kernel. This means all you have is basic VGA "safe-mode" level support, which isn't even fast enough to play an MPEG2. My final try was to install Debian 5, which was period correct and had support for my hardware, but the live CDs of the the time were not hybrid so the ISO could not boot from USB. I didn't have a burner so I finally gave up.

So I think these types of projects are fun for a proof of concept, but unfortunately are never going to give life to old computers.

show 8 replies
urbandw311ertoday at 8:54 AM

There’s something really lovely about this project - especially as they’re using the last kernel from May 2025 before x486 support was removed. It feels like somebody lovingly mending their car for one last time or something similar. (I’m tired but you can probably find a cuter metaphor)

Fiveplustoday at 5:25 AM

The persistence strategy described here (mount -t msdos -o rw /dev/fd0 /mnt) combined with a bind mount to home is a nice clever touch for saving space.

I don't know if that's also true for data integrity on physical magnetic media. FAT12 is not a journaling filesystem. On a modern drive, a crash during a write is at best, annoying while on a 3.5" floppy with a 33mhz CPU, a write operation blocks for a perceptible amount of time. If the user hits the power switch or the kernel panics while the heads are moving or the FAT is updating, that disk is gone. The article mentions sync, but sync on a floppy drive is an agonizingly slow operation that users might interrupt.

Given the 253KiB free space constraint, I wonder if a better approach would be treating the free space as a raw block device or a tiny appended partition using a log-structured filesystem designed for slow media (like a stripped down JFFS2 or something), though that might require too many kernel modules.

Has anyone out there experimented with appending a tar archive to the end of the initramfs image inplace for persistence, rather than mounting the raw FAT filesystem? It might be safer to serialize writes only on shutdown, would love more thoughts on this.

show 4 replies
hiltitoday at 5:12 AM

I remember the QNX Demo on a 1.44 MB floppy disk. It booted straight into a full blown window manager and had a basic web browser. That was 1999 and I never saw anything like that afterwards.

show 4 replies
cbdevidaltoday at 9:01 AM

It’s amazing to me that the floppy is still a relevant target unit. Just large enough to be useful, small enough to be a real challenge to use well. I don’t see the same passion for 700MB CDROM distributions, probably because the challenge just isn’t there.

mobiliotoday at 8:08 AM

25 years ago i used floppyfw

https://www.zelow.no/floppyfw/

to setup small router on 486 with 12 MB ram and run flawless. Later i get Linksys WRT54GL and decommissioned that machine.

show 1 reply
dirkctoday at 7:26 AM

We used to call the 1.44MB (3.5inch) disk stiffies, since they are rigid, while the physically bigger disks we used to refer to as floppies.

And they used to fail all the time, especially when you had something that spanned more than a single disk.

show 1 reply
tensilitytoday at 9:17 AM

Bring back Slackware?

ameliustoday at 9:00 AM

I remember the days when Linux came on 50 floppies.

show 1 reply
zoobabtoday at 8:15 AM

I was making routers our of old PCs (486 or early pentiums) with 2 network cards (3com or ne2000) back in 2000 with floppies and CoyoteLinux. Installed 10s of them in the students houses.

heinternetstoday at 5:05 AM

I miss the floppy disk sound and the anticipation then joy of finally loading into the OS.

show 1 reply
jdubtoday at 5:54 AM

> After 5 minutes I got freshly burned floppy.

oh god

show 1 reply
grewil2today at 7:32 AM

Since it’s an 1.44M image I assume they use 3.5” diskettes. The terms floppy and diskette are used as synonyms today, but the different names make sense since floppies are flexible and “floppy”. Diskettinux?

6LLvveMx2koXfwntoday at 5:14 AM

Did I misremember downloading Slackware to 12 floppies in 1997?

show 4 replies
yjftsjthsd-htoday at 5:52 AM

I thought Linux dropped driver support for real floppy drives. Did that not happen, or am I missing something?

show 3 replies
hn_throwaway_99today at 5:10 AM

What's a floppy?

show 2 replies
ggmtoday at 5:18 AM

mgr on sun hardware probably could have come close

jstrebeltoday at 7:50 AM

Ok, impressive, but - why? No current computer has a floppy disk drive anymore. The Web Page claims building such a disk is a learning exercise, but the knowledge offered is pretty arcane, even for regular Linux users. Is this pure nostalgia?

show 2 replies