That case started over a year ago, I would have expected the topic to come up long ago if this was motivated by the shooting. Granted, lawmaking takes longer than public sentiment lasts, but I didn't really hear much about 3D-printed guns at the time.

Given the potential chain of custody issues, I'm not sure we can be certain a 3D printed gun was involved at all.

And they're still doing anything except addressing the grievances that lead to that.

EDIT: I think you mean "allegedly"