logoalt Hacker News

kmmyesterday at 5:41 PM5 repliesview on HN

And a megabyte is depending on the context precisely 1000x1000=1,000,000 or 1024x1024=1,048,576 bytes*, except when you're talking about the classic 3.5 inch floppy disks, where "1.44 MB" stands for 1440x1024 bytes, or about 1.47 true MB or 1.41 MiB.

* Yeah, I read the article. Regardless of the IEC's noble attempt, in all my years of working with people and computers I've never heard anyone actually pronounce MiB (or write it out in full) as "mebibyte".


Replies

nixpulvistoday at 2:14 AM

They should be more precise if they are talking about KiB in a context where the difference matters... luckily those contexts are usually written down.

superjanyesterday at 7:31 PM

Well the 1.44 MB, was called that because it was 1440 KB, twice the capacity of the 720k floppy, and 4x the 360k floppy. It made perfect sense to me at that time.

show 1 reply
pifyesterday at 6:13 PM

> I've never heard

It doesn't matter. "kilo" means 1000. People are free to use it wrong if they wish.

show 3 replies
whichquestionyesterday at 8:46 PM

I worked with networked attached storage systems at pib scale several years ago and we referred to things in gib/tib because it was significant when referring to the size of systems and we needed to be precise.

That being said, I think the difference between mib and mb is niche for most people

pwdisswordfishyyesterday at 8:04 PM

> classic 3.5 inch floppy disks

90 mm floppy disks. https://jdebp.uk/FGA/floppy-discs-are-90mm-not-3-and-a-half-...

Which I have taken to calling 1440 KiB – accurate and pretty recognizable at the same time.