logoalt Hacker News

grim_ioyesterday at 6:57 PM6 repliesview on HN

Why not in gold while we're at it?

Both are equally stupid, and you have to exchange them to buy most of the things you might need.


Replies

cheonn638yesterday at 7:13 PM

> Why not in gold while we're at it?

Crypto more hype-able

mrguyoramayesterday at 10:32 PM

YC connected people aren't as invested into gold as they are crypto.

iwontberudeyesterday at 7:18 PM

Why not a gold backed stable coin like PAXG?

observationistyesterday at 7:28 PM

I mean, asking for $500 in gold every paycheck would be kinda cool, or getting gold coinage each pay cycle on a rolling basis, as many coins as your repeated $500 contributions buy.

It'd be friction against spending, a little bit of investing, in the case of gold, but friction against spending with crypto only makes sense if you don't lose a lot on moving it into a real bank account.

show 1 reply
mikkupikkuyesterday at 7:06 PM

Guess they want cryptobros, not gold bugs.

Supermanchoyesterday at 7:18 PM

Why? Because the US stable coins are an abstraction on top of US treasuries. It's effectively trading in the US debt market, not trading in crypto-hype.

The Fed is interested in converting the debt to another medium, for obvious reasons. Stablecoin looks to be the leader, since a number of the new administration have talked about it in the last decade (re: Scott Besset stablecoin speech).

I can understand why some companies want their runway in a currency that may go up during a transition (a more favorable exchange rate). There's little lossage in the exchange of USDT/USDC in the short term. Seems like a hedge strategy.

show 1 reply