logoalt Hacker News

troadyesterday at 11:42 PM3 repliesview on HN

Notoriously not actually secure, at least in the case of Flatpak. (Can't speak to Snap)

Not sure how something can be called a sandbox without the actual box part. As Siri is to AI, Flatpak is to sandboxes.


Replies

vondurtoday at 2:24 AM

I assumed the primary feature of Flatpak was to make a “universal” package across all Linux platforms. The security side of things seems to be a secondary consideration. I assume that the security aspect is now a much higher priority.

jacobgkauyesterday at 11:44 PM

The XDG portal standards being developed to provide permissions to apps (and allow users to manage them), including those installed via Flatpak, will continue to be useful if and when the sandboxing security of Flatpaks are improved. (In fact, having the frontend management part in place is kind of a prerequisite to really enforcing a lot of restrictions on apps, lest they just stop working suddenly.)

FergusArgylltoday at 12:02 AM

Doesn't it use bwrap under the hood? what's wrong with that?

show 1 reply