logoalt Hacker News

XCSmetoday at 5:53 PM3 repliesview on HN

Oh wow, I thought humans are like 0.1% error rate, if they are native speakers and aware of the subject being discussed.


Replies

zipy124today at 7:01 PM

I was skepitcal upon hearing the figure but various sources do indeed back it up and [0] is a pretty interesting paper (old but still relevant human transcibers haven't changed in accuracy).

[0] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/...

show 1 reply
rhdunntoday at 8:51 PM

It can depend a lot on different factors like:

- familiarity with the accent and/or speaker;

- speed and style/cadence of the speech;

- any other audio that is happening that can muffle or distort the audio;

- etc.

It can also take multiple passes to get a decent transcription.

show 1 reply
Nimitz14today at 9:17 PM

Most of these errors will not be meaningful. Real speech is full of ambiguities. 3% is low