It lost a lot of subscribers because of its changed politics.
And a hundred million a year is play money to someone who earns (low estimate) $2m an hour.
I know people who cancelled the subscription because they refused to endorse a candidate.
I don't quite understand why, because refusing to endorse anyone is a neutral step. I've always found newspaper endorsements to feel slimy. I'm not ascribing some kind of noble reason for them choosing not to endorse Harris, but their move to was to endorse _no one_.
People need a subscription service to reinforce their own beliefs?