alt Hacker NewsYou misunderstand what occurred. The paper prepared an endorsement and Bezos killed it.
> they refused to endorse a candidate.
> for them choosing not to endorse Harris
There was no "they" or "them" involved.
You misunderstand what occurred. The paper prepared an endorsement and Bezos killed it.
> they refused to endorse a candidate.
> for them choosing not to endorse Harris
There was no "they" or "them" involved.
My point is that why were they picking a candidate to begin with, even before Bezos got involved. Why wasn’t that the thing that annoyed people?
I don’t like the idea of a paper taking sides (even if, in this case, their endorsement aligned with my side).
It seems antithetical to the ideas of independent and non-partisan journalism.