logoalt Hacker News

notRobottoday at 1:56 PM5 repliesview on HN

Wikipedia is actually the secondary source when someone reads a page on it, and it requires primary sources (like factbooks) to cite to exist.


Replies

Antibabelictoday at 2:03 PM

This is incorrect. Wikipedia relies primarily on secondary sources, which makes it a tertiary source, and it describes itself this way.[1] The World Factbook does not collect the information it provides, making it a secondary source.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:PSTS

show 1 reply
Loughlatoday at 2:51 PM

The problem is who checks the sources. Of the what billions of sources, how many have actually been verified?

show 2 replies
tokaitoday at 4:15 PM

Encyclopedias are by definition tertiary sources.

SanjayMehtatoday at 3:40 PM

Wikipedia does not allow primary sources.

show 2 replies