logoalt Hacker News

ecshaferyesterday at 6:00 PM7 repliesview on HN

I think people should be able to get up to 3 votes:

1. Veteran

2. Property ownership

3. Having children.

If you dont hit 1 of those criteria, you dont get a vote. You need skin in the game. Letting anyone vote is why “tax someone else, give me things” is such a popular platform. Politicians should have to hit maybe 2 out of 3.


Replies

afavouryesterday at 6:03 PM

Property ownership seems like a pretty transparent way to disenfranchise the poor. In what way does a renter not have “skin in the game” compared to a homeowner?

HansardExpertyesterday at 6:11 PM

I am none of these. I'm in my late 50's and have been paying income tax since I was 16. Sure, rescind my voting rights ... I'd like all my 40+ years taxes back please then.

show 1 reply
telesillayesterday at 6:10 PM

Having children? Why not consider instead: teacher, healthcare professional, municipal worker, civil engineer, volunteer ...and all of the many other roles that make society. Being a parent isn't the only indicator of caring for others.

subscribedyesterday at 9:05 PM

Property ownership?

Ooooh, this is how you tip the scales further away from the progressive policies.

I own a house but I'd hate such setup.

iwontberudeyesterday at 6:07 PM

We already tried this in America and it’s not the flex you think it is.

show 1 reply
ericmayyesterday at 6:02 PM

The main issue off the top of my head with property ownership is how you define property.