logoalt Hacker News

Ar-Curunirtoday at 7:12 AM4 repliesview on HN

If someone told you 5 years ago that a computer generated a working C compiler, would you think it was a big deal or not?


Replies

eb08a167today at 10:13 AM

A computer generating a compiler is nothing new. Unzip has done this many many times. The key difference is that unzip extracts data from an archive in a deterministic way, while LLMs recover data from the training dataset using a lossy statistical model. Aid that with a feedback loop and a rich test suite, and you get exactly what Anthropic has achieved.

While I agree that the technology behind this is impressive, the biggest issue is license infringement. Everyone knows there's GPL code in the training data, yet there's no trace of acknowledgment of the original authors.

show 2 replies
mdavid626today at 7:47 AM

Sounds amazing, but the computer didn’t do it out of blue with intelligence, but more like cookie-cutter style from already existing code.

What’s the big deal about that?

show 1 reply
chadcmulligantoday at 7:34 AM

yeah its pretty amazing it can do this. The problem is the gaslighting by the companies making this - "see we can create compilers, we won't need programmers", programmers - "this is crap, are you insane?", classic gas lighting.

show 1 reply
player1234today at 11:17 AM

[dead]