> In this case, it’s true that compilers were in its training data but only helped at the conceptual level and not spitting verbatim gcc code.
How do you know that?
At this point AI coding feels like religion. You have to believe in it.
well the part where it's written in rust was a lil bit of a giveaway
How do I know that? The code is not similar to GCC at any level except conceptual. If you can point out the similarity at any level I might agree with you.