What do you mean day by day.
We have known this to be the case, for quite some time, yet majority of the public still thought that a convicted felon was good enough to be president.
That is the uncharitable interpretation. I think it is at least as likely that voters consistently get to chose between a turd sandwich and a giant douche, so it will always be possible to accuse them of preferring a terrible candidate.
Also, nitpick: it was neither a majority of the public, or a majority of the eligible voting population, or even a majority of the people who voted.
I think a really good first step, at least in the US, towards making our candidate selection better would be to mandate open primaries.
I think that's the exact irony that the parent is eluding to.
It's all about the kids, unless, idk, you're rich enough?