logoalt Hacker News

vampiregreyyesterday at 7:55 PM4 repliesview on HN

At this point, GitHub outages feel closer to cloud provider outages than a SaaS blip. Curious how many people here still run self-hosted Git (GitLab / Gitea) vs fully outsourcing version control.


Replies

neilvyesterday at 8:31 PM

Yay for GitLab and Forgejo/Gitea.

My previous two startups used GitLab successfully. The smaller startup used paid-tier hosted by gitlab.com. The bigger startup (with strategic cutting-edge IP, and multinational security sensitivity) used the expensive on-prem enterprise GitLab.

(The latter startup, I spent some principal engineer political capital to move us to GitLab, after our software team was crippled by the Microsoft Azure-branded thing that non-software people had purchased by default. It helped that GitLab had a testimonial from Nvidia, since we were also in the AI hardware space.)

If you prefer to use fully open source, or have $0 budget, there's also Forgejo (forked from Gitea). I'm using it for my current one-person side-startup, and it's mostly as good as GitLab for Git, issues, boards, and wiki. The "scoped" issue labels, which I use heavily, are standard in Foregejo, but paid-tier in GitLab. I haven't yet exercised the CI features.

yoyohello13yesterday at 11:21 PM

We self-host the full fat version of GitLab and it's very worth it.

arthur-styesterday at 8:38 PM

Self-hosted Gitea is a good time if you're comfortable taking care of backups and other self-hosting stuff.

betabyyesterday at 8:03 PM

Self hosted GitLab is absolutely worth it.

show 6 replies