logoalt Hacker News

The Day the Telnet Died

166 pointsby pjfyesterday at 10:20 PM94 commentsview on HN

Comments

trebligdivadyesterday at 11:53 PM

Why are people still using telnet across the internet in this century? Was this _all_ attack traffic?

(OK, I know one ancient talker that uses it - but on a very non-standard port so a port 23 block wouldn't be relevant)

show 10 replies
petefordetoday at 1:25 AM

The scope of this CVE and the response to it are genuinely wild.

It's crazy to think that some dude is singlehandedly responsible for ultimately ending the telnet era in such a definitive way.

One for the history books.

show 1 reply
catskullyesterday at 11:58 PM

When I was an intern for some reason they issued me a voip phone for my desk. One day I got bored and figured out I could telnet into it. Nothing interesting but it was still a fun moment for me!

show 2 replies
Animatsyesterday at 11:35 PM

So eleven years ago someone put a backdoor in the Telnet daemon.

Who?

Where's the commit?

show 4 replies
keyletoday at 12:53 AM

It's nice to not see C being blamed for once! ... Just good old lack of reasoning (which is most C's codebase downfall, agreeably).

show 1 reply
Twisolyesterday at 11:24 PM

> Someone upstream of a significant chunk of the internet’s transit infrastructure apparently decided telnet traffic isn’t worth carrying anymore. That’s probably the right call.

Does this impact traffic for MUDs at all? I know several MUDs operate on nonstandard Telnet ports, but many still allow connection on port 23. Does this block end-to-end Telnet traffic, or does it only block attempts to access Telnet services on the backbone relays themselves?

show 3 replies
charcircuittoday at 12:15 AM

The design of telnet and ssh where you have a daemon running as root is bad security that as shown here is a liability, a ticking time bomb ready to give attackers root.

show 3 replies
iberatoryesterday at 11:21 PM

Stranger article. I wasn't able to get the main point of this article. Strangely written, but hey - I'm nob native by any means.

ps.

telnet SDF.org

just works...

show 1 reply
erichansontoday at 1:24 AM

I used to telnet into my POP3 account and check email by protocol. Shucks.

show 1 reply
RonanSolesteyesterday at 11:23 PM

I still used telnet today (had to). Unsure of the patching here. But its definitely locked down to a subset of internal use only.

show 1 reply
gerdesjyesterday at 11:29 PM

telnet isn't just for ... telnet.

  $ telnet smtp.example.co.uk 25
  HELO me
  MAIL FROM: [email protected]
  RCPT TO: [email protected]
  DATA
.. or you can use SWAKS! For some odd reason telnet is becoming rare as an installed binary.
show 4 replies
fsmvtoday at 12:32 AM

Your cookie banner is very inconvenient and made me leave your website and not read the article

lacunarytoday at 12:10 AM

telnet + shijack = good times

adolphyesterday at 11:16 PM

The pattern points toward one or more North American Tier 1 transit providers implementing port 23 filtering

show 1 reply
gogascatoday at 12:40 AM

[dead]

davebrantonyesterday at 11:29 PM

Why would somebody read something that somebody couldn't be bothered to write? This article is AI slop.

show 2 replies
jopythontoday at 12:27 AM

This is about Telnetd. Not telnet itself.

show 2 replies