I read this as "a shortage of tensors" and was curious as to the latest chicanery.
But yeah tenors right -- matches my experience.
Tensors are in no shortage nowadays. I did read this a tensors though and got a good laugh.
The site is called The Economist so I thought this was going to be about not having enough choices for tenor on loans and similar contracts.
The tenor of the conversation is different than you expected?
Given that it's the economist, it could have been about illiquidity in the bond markets.
I assumed it meant interest rate swap tenors. We need liquidity at the six year point!
Might explain the strange weather.
And here I read the word correctly, yet thought it was going to be about bonds, and the rise of 50- and 100-year maturities. I am a singer btw