> We don't have a model for a LLM that does exist will respond to a specific query either.

Yes we do... It's math, you can calculate it.

> No, it's not and I'm getting tired of explaining this. If you think it is, write your paper and get very rich.

Why would I get rich for explaining how to do math?

> You clearly don't understand any of this.

Could you be more specific?

Quantum physics is stupidly hard to calculate when you approach realistic situations.

A real LLM takes a GPU a fraction of a second.

They're both hard to interpret, please realize I'm agreeing that LLMs are hard to interpret. But they're easier than QM on some other fronts.

And mentioning copenhagen or many-worlds doesn't show that quantum mechanics are easy to interpret, that's about as useful as saying an LLM works like neuron activation.

> Oh really ? Lol

Here's one of many posts about it. https://cameronrwolfe.substack.com/p/llm-scaling-laws