alt Hacker NewsDirect voting does not replace judiciary or even senate, it only augments the house of congress.
Can you bring one example where the public wanted to treat a group unjustly and parliament elected by that same public have defended the group?
Direct voting does not replace judiciary or even senate, it only augments the house of congress.
Can you bring one example where the public wanted to treat a group unjustly and parliament elected by that same public have defended the group?
What I originally commented on was this:
I take issue with the implication that it's all or nothing. If we characterize anything less than a direct vote on every issue as anti-democratic, then the only people left standing will be kooks.