logoalt Hacker News

mjevanstoday at 3:49 AM4 repliesview on HN

How about just requiring browser, OS vendors, and phone makers to give parents real child accounts that are easy to use and keep kids off the Internet?


Replies

zythyxtoday at 5:01 AM

There are a lot of actual solutions that could be implemented that don't invade privacy, but that's the point. These rules are all designed TO invade your privacy. They're designed for you to give up your online anonymity and make you accountable for your speech and actions online.

show 1 reply
GuB-42today at 4:19 AM

I would rather avoid having the government decide what I should run on my devices, private companies are already bad enough.

mattnewtontoday at 4:18 AM

I'm becoming increasingly cynical that the lack of privacy in online communication is what most of the sponsors of these bills are after, and people thinking of the real harms to children are useful to them.

trinix912today at 9:00 AM

This would suddenly mean no more custom browsers, no more custom OSes, and I doubt they'd cater to the Linux and BSD crowds with this one. It's something the OSS community has been trying to fight for the last 4 decades. With a full-on government requirement this would lock you to the vetted platforms while letting anything other get in would be illegal for the site owners.

show 2 replies