logoalt Hacker News

mock-possumyesterday at 5:06 PM4 repliesview on HN

Oh wow that is fun. Also if the writeup isn’t misrepresenting the situation, then I feel like it’s actually a good point - if there’s an easy drop-in speed-up, why does it matter whether it’s suggest by a human or an LLM agent?


Replies

input_shyesterday at 5:32 PM

Not everything is about being 100% efficient.

LLM didn't discover this issue, developers found it. Instead of fixing it themselves, they intentionally turned the problem into an issue, left it open for a new human contributor to pick up, and tagged it as such.

If everything was about efficiency, the issue wouldn't have been open to begin with, as writing it (https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/31130) and fending off LLM attempts at fixing them absolutely took more effort than if they were to fix it themselves (https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/31132/changes).

show 1 reply
throwaway29473yesterday at 5:13 PM

Good first issues are curated to help humans onboard.

show 1 reply
avaeryesterday at 5:21 PM

It matters because if the code is illegal, stolen, contains a backdoor, or whatever, you can jail a human author after the fact to disincentivize such naughty behavior.