logoalt Hacker News

CamperBob2today at 3:26 AM1 replyview on HN

This seems fine...?

https://chatgpt.com/share/698e992b-f44c-800b-a819-f899e83da2...

I don't see anything wrong with its reasoning. UM16 isn't explicitly mentioned in the data sheet, but the UM prefix is listed in the 'Device marking code' column. The model hedges its response accordingly ("If the marking is UM16 on an SMA/DO-214AC package...") and reads the graph in Fig. 1 correctly.

Of course, it took 18 minutes of crunching to get the answer, which seems a tad excessive.


Replies

londons_exploretoday at 9:02 AM

Indeed that answer is awesome. Much better than Gemini 2.5 pro which invented a 16 kilovolt diode which it just hoped would be marked "UM16".