logoalt Hacker News

famouswafflesyesterday at 7:48 PM2 repliesview on HN

The paper has all those prominent institutions who acknowledge the contribution so realistically, why would you be skeptical ?


Replies

kristopolousyesterday at 7:54 PM

they probably also acknowledge pytorch, numpy, R ... but we don't attribute those tools as the agent who did the work.

I know we've been primed by sci-fi movies and comic books, but like pytorch, gpt-5.2 is just a piece of software running on a computer instrumented by humans.

show 2 replies
Refreeze5224yesterday at 7:55 PM

Their point is, would you be able to prompt your way to this result? No. Already trained physicists working at world-leading institutions could. So what progress have we really made here?

show 1 reply