logoalt Hacker News

hdjrudnitoday at 3:11 AM7 repliesview on HN

But why?

npmjs.com is not slow and not something I need to interact with very often.

And npmjs.com is still the authority when it comes to publishing packages, no? So I'd still have to use it.


Replies

xhcuvuvyctoday at 5:26 AM

Because they wanted to and Claude didn't tell them not to. Why even ask questions like this at this point.

show 3 replies
pier25today at 4:07 AM

I almost never use npmjs.com.

When I do it’s just to click on the repo link.

show 1 reply
brycelarkintoday at 3:19 AM

npmjs search is very slow

show 2 replies
nickradfordtoday at 4:16 AM

It is really annoying if you have a package that is relatively new to the platform, and you type in the exact package name, that package is not reliably the first result.

Minor edge case, but infuriating if you want to check your own packages quickly (without needing to navigate menu > packages > YOUR_PACKAGE).

Still agree with you though, who is npmx actually for?

show 1 reply
jauntywundrkindtoday at 5:56 AM

It sparks more joy than the old one and buddy, that's for frelling enough damn it. Whinge out!

Awful comment. Your comment is bad and should be ashamed.

Use it and disagree! Tell me it in fact does not spark more joy! This just seems pretty clear, ya'll.

It's just generally vastly nicer. I love that file exploration of packages doesn't feel like a last afterthought before leaving the solar system forever.

jasonjmcgheetoday at 3:56 AM

Cynically, if you can attract a representative sample, you could aggregate and sell analytics data.

Another could be to have an "alternatives" section based on semantic similarity and / or some other features that have signal.