> I’m simply reposting accurate and direct information that is already public and already highlighted by TFA.

No you aren't. To quote:

> There ought to be social consequences for using machines to mindlessly and recklessly libel people.

Ars didn't libel anyone. They misquoted with manufactured quotes, but the quotes weren't libelous in anyway because they weren't harmful to his reputation.

Indeed, you are closer to libel than they are.

For example, if these quotes were added during some automated editing processes by Ars rather than the authors themselves then your statement is both harmful to their reputation and false.

> These people should never publish for a professional outlet like Ars ever again. Publishing entirely hallucinated quotes without fact checking is a fireable offense in my book.

That's going perilously close to calling for them to be sacked over something which I think everyone would acknowledge is a mistake.