logoalt Hacker News

thrdbndndntoday at 10:29 AM2 repliesview on HN

I don't get how it works.

> Encoding: Files are chunked, encoded with fountain codes, and embedded into video frames

Wouldn't YouTube just compress/re-encode your video and ruin your data (assuming you want bit-by-bit accurate recovery)?

If you have some redundancy to counter this, wouldn't it be super inefficient?

(Admittedly, I've never heard of "fountain codes", which is probably crucial to understanding how it works.)


Replies

Jaxantoday at 10:35 AM

Yes it is inefficient. But youtube pays the storage ;-). (There is probably a limit on free accounts, and it is probably not allowed by the TOS.)

show 1 reply
sdenton4today at 3:53 PM

Yeah, I would assume that transcodes kill this eventually...