> they'd rather vibe code themselves than trust an unproven engineering firm
You could cut the statement short here, and it would still be a reasonable position to take these days.
LLMs are still complex, sharp tools - despite their simple appearance and proteststions of both biggest fans and haters alike, the dominating factor for effectiveness of an LLM tool on a problem is still whether or not you're holding it wrong.
I forgot about that Jobs/Apple reference!
Paraphasing, LLMs are great (bad) tools for the right (wrong) job...
in the right hands,
at the right time,
in the right place...