Not clear if the author realises that all commercial SQL database engines support querying of the database's metadata using SQL. Or maybe I have misunderstood - I only skimmed the article.
Differently though, AFAIR PostgreSQL does most of the schema changes transactionally, but not MySQL.
Yeah, this seemed like a very long way to say, "Our RDBMS has system catalogs," as if it's 1987.
But then, they're also doing JOINs with the USING clause, which seems like one of those things that everybody tries... until they hit one of the several reasons not to use them, and then they go back to the ON clause which is explicit and concrete and works great in all cases.
Personally, I'd like to hear more about the claims made about Snowflake IDs.