logoalt Hacker News

linkjuice4alltoday at 5:41 AM4 repliesview on HN

It's especially strange considering the amount of work that Tesla (the company) put into becoming a car manufacturer which is certainly no easy feat. I'm sure some of the know-how, process, and tooling/supply lines could be transitioned to general purpose robot manufacturing - but why would you build these supply lines and factories just to screw it all up like this?


Replies

CTDOCodebasestoday at 6:02 AM

Judging by the news isn’t the pivot to creating autonomous driving systems for other manufacturers cars?

If I’m understanding correctly the pivot is to sell just the autonomous driving systems. This way it can be trained on more data. It’s a hard sell to do this while competing against the car makers whose business they are trying to court.

Selling actual cars was like Uber when they started with a black car service. Get into the luxury market then leverage that so get into the mass market.

Perhaps this is why Elon has been so adamant about not using LiDAR

show 1 reply
maxdotoday at 6:34 AM

Ai solved(ing) coding in 2026

Robots doing drunken panda moves FSD are insanely good using MacBook grade + and not even grass iPhone hardware

few other companies are doing large scale self driving large scale pilots

Cars are already heavily built using specialized robots today

Id say it’s equally stupid for any other car brand to invest money into something not autonomous or robotics.

ihagentoday at 9:17 AM

The world has changed. Cars belong to a consumerism-driven, globalized economy. Humanoid robots and AI belong to a technofeudal, fascist-like state with a government-driven economy. The ruler relies on his elite. The elite relies on AI, humanoid robots, and drones to project the ruler’s power and maintain the status quo. The peasants are no longer needed. They are now seen only as a burden.

forgetfreemantoday at 6:05 AM

Actually if you run the tape back Tesla spent over a decade on trivially preventable manufacturing fuckups by attempting to ignore a century of industry knowledge on the subject and just wing it silicon valley style. That they have infrastructure that is capable of performing manufacturing at some scale is not in question. That any of it is sufficiently optimized for sanity to be repurposed remains to be seen.

show 2 replies