logoalt Hacker News

jadenPetetoday at 12:02 AM5 repliesview on HN

Then won’t foreign governments just ban freedom.gov? This problem has already been solved with networks like Tor and I2P. It seems like it would be more strategic to fund those projects instead.


Replies

jjmarrtoday at 5:16 AM

> This problem has already been solved with networks like Tor and I2P. It seems like it would be more strategic to fund those projects instead.

The US government is responsible for 35% of Tor's funding[1] and has been its primary sponsor since Tor was invented as a side project in the US Naval Research Lab.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tor_Project

nickorlowtoday at 12:25 AM

US can probably use their soft power to influence them not to do that. Also would imagine the US gov could also set up some more censorship resistant access methods.

show 3 replies
carlosjobimtoday at 2:38 AM

Maybe that's the purpose? Pushing European and global "allies" to show their cards. Some citizens will support more censorship, while some will start questioning. It's good to know where your rivals stand.

Also it is cheap, easy, non-controversial domestically in the US, and ethically coherent with American values.

show 2 replies
scythetoday at 1:28 AM

It's a propaganda maneuver. And it's obviously just as critical of China as it is of Europe. The State Department's public voices may be immersed in the culture war but there are probably a few cooler heads left who have learned to keep out of the spotlight.

zmgsabsttoday at 12:53 AM

Sure — but the UK or EU has to accept the constant rhetoric of “you clearly don’t support free speech, you block freedom.gov” when discussing with the US.

I don’t think it’s meant to be a perfect solution; I think it’s meant to be a political tool.

Also, the US does fund Tor — originally US Navy + DARPA, now through Dept of State. Entirely possible that they’ll eventually operate a Tor onion site for freedom.gov too.

show 1 reply