Why stop there!
We should refuse to accept coding agents until they have fully replaced chromium. By that point, the world will see that our reticence was wisdom.
The article already concludes coding agents have uses in areas they already do well. What specifically can be continued leading you to think should instead not be used?
I read the article more as an indictment of the promises being made vs reality. If we’re being told these agents are so good, why aren’t these companies eating their own dog food to the same degree they’re telling us to eat it?