logoalt Hacker News

mjevansyesterday at 8:04 PM2 repliesview on HN

Were the market functioning, there would be sufficient additional housing near jobs that investors could not sit on and rent-seek reselling property near those jobs as a source of profit.

The market is not free. It is heavily regulated by what can be built where when. There is a distinct lack of planning and regulation to protect consumers in this market.


Replies

JuniperMesosyesterday at 8:41 PM

It's true that there are heavy regulations on what housing can be built where, but I don't think this is primarily driven by "investors" (in the sense of people who make their money by being commercial or residential landlords). I think it's primarily driven by homeowner-occupiers - people who own the homes that they themselves live in, who are not professional investors trying to maximize their rental profit, and who care a lot about the ways in which new construction or the ability of more people to live near them might negatively effect their quality of life in the place they live.

show 2 replies
thranceyesterday at 8:21 PM

The free market consolidated into this on its own. Some actors became too powerful for it to remain "free".