logoalt Hacker News

ojagodzinskiyesterday at 8:38 PM10 repliesview on HN

~3000€ to show information in some random places in the house even though the household members have a device with a screen called a smartphone next to them 24/7 ?

Well, it's cool, but the usability of it all is below average.

Declutter your life and don't install any more screens in your home ;)


Replies

binarysneakeryesterday at 11:53 PM

Next time you decide to post something so snarky, maybe remember where you are. This is hackernews, people experiment and build things. Not always for the right reasons, and that's fine. If you don't like it, just move along. There's plenty of people, myself included, that are thankful for posts like this.

unpopularoppyesterday at 9:25 PM

It's a hobby but not for everyone. I mean if I could just throw away 3,000€ on random projects that might work or not I'd do it in a heartbeat. No different than buying a run down Porsche for 5,000€ and spending 40,000€ on restoration to original. Every hobby is like that but with different entry price points. There is a reason knitting is more popular than something like this (and even that has price tiers from 3€ for an acrylic yarn to upwards 100€ for luxury merino wool yarn)

show 1 reply
ReaderOfRunesyesterday at 10:52 PM

This is just unnecessarily mean-spirited and unconstructive

dave_sidyesterday at 11:52 PM

You just don’t get it but that’s fine. I get it. If the price was more affordable I’d have one on my hall asap.

bob001yesterday at 9:18 PM

Pick up phone (may be in another room), unlock phone, open app, navigate to information in app (often fairly annoying due to modern low information density app design and multiple apps), return to original location.

Versus.

Just look at screen.

show 1 reply
galleywest200yesterday at 8:55 PM

Alternative: just keep your phone on your charger in your room and declutter your life by using just the one screen in the kitchen.

show 1 reply
yellowappleyesterday at 8:58 PM

For those who lack the technical aptitude to use a smartphone (e.g. children, the elderly), a device that shows information in random places in the home is much more useful.

show 2 replies
randomtoastyesterday at 9:32 PM

I think you could make it work for a fraction of the price if you buy a bunch of low-cost e-ink screens and combine them to create a larger display. The main challenge would be on the software side, as you'd need to control the content so it appears as a single, cohesive screen. However, I think this approach would be more appealing in terms of cost for most people.

lloydatkinsonyesterday at 10:08 PM

This is exactly the type of nasty, mean-spirited, closed minded, completely lacking the hacker spirit comment I see so often on HN now.

croesyesterday at 9:31 PM

We waste billions of dollars so that AI creates recipes in the style of an Eminem rap and pelicans riding on a bike.

This is much more useful compared to that