logoalt Hacker News

obliotoday at 8:32 AM4 repliesview on HN

And, I guess, even more advanced surveillance.


Replies

zemvpferreiratoday at 8:44 AM

I think we’re well past the point where mass surveillance was a technical challenge. Mass oppression through autonomous violence however…

show 2 replies
pu_petoday at 8:51 AM

LIDAR would be preferrable to cameras when it comes to privacy actually

show 4 replies
echelontoday at 8:39 AM

The minute internet became widespread it was game over.

Pros and cons. :/

It'll never happen, but we need a bill of rights for privacy. The laypeople aren't well-versed or pained enough to ask for this, and big interest donors oppose it.

Maybe the EU and states like California will pioneer something here, though?

Edit: in general, I'm far more excited by cheap lidar tech than I am afraid of the downsides. We just need to be vigilant.

show 2 replies
rfv6723today at 10:21 AM

Humanity has never known a world without surveillance. Responsibility cannot exist without being watched. Primitive tribes lived under the constant eye of the group, and agricultural eras relied on the strict oversight of the clan. Modern states simply adopted new tools for an ancient necessity. A society without monitoring is a society without accountability, which only leads to the Hobbesian trap of endless conflict.

show 3 replies