The rise of eyes began with just one

Gift link:

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/23/science/evolution-vertebr...

Don't we have single celled organisms with more than one 'eye' now?

We've been able to sense light and shadow even before we became multicellular, didn't we? And this article seems to be implying rather otherwise.

See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parietal_eye, a remnant "third eye" on the top of the head in some species.

What benefit is an eye unless there is also the capability of processing and using the information? How would both evolve simultaneously?

Speculation 1. The bicameral mind was created as a result.

Speculation 2. The earliest creatures with two eyes may have been conjoined twins -- which were more successful in life than their single-celled/bodied siblings.

That “cyclopean” eye is described as a patch of light-sensitive cells.

Darwin was not puzzled.

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree. When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science. Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself originated; but I may remark that, as some of the lowest organisms, in which nerves cannot be detected, are capable of perceiving light, it does not seem impossible that certain sensitive elements in their sarcode should become aggregated and developed into nerves, endowed with this special sensibility.”

And in a letter to Asa Gray, professor of natural history at Harvard:

"The eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when I think of the fine known gradations, my reason tells me I ought to conquer the cold shudder.”