logoalt Hacker News

octoberfranklinyesterday at 10:46 PM6 repliesview on HN

That AI was trained on the GPLv2 Linux source code, which does have a driver for your Wi-Fi.

How is this not copyright laundering?


Replies

snowhaleyesterday at 11:08 PM

the spec-first approach is actually the historical clean-room technique, same way Phoenix BIOS was legally written without copyright exposure in the 80s -- one team writes spec from observation, completely separate team codes from spec only, no shared authors. here it's AI doing both passes but in different sessions with no shared context, which approximates the same separation. probably good enough legally but definitely interesting that the same old trick applies.

show 1 reply
neomyesterday at 11:11 PM

We'll know once these 51 cases have worked their way through the courts: https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/2025/10/08/status-of-all...

yjftsjthsd-htoday at 2:12 AM

The general question is worth asking, but in this particular case, the article says

> Brcmfmac is a Linux driver (ISC licence) for set of FullMAC chips from Broadcom

cryptonectoryesterday at 11:05 PM

Prove the new code is similar to the corresponding driver in Linux. If you can then you can get the authors of the latter to file suit against TFA.

jdlygayesterday at 11:03 PM

A very, very good point