logoalt Hacker News

mccoybtoday at 12:58 AM1 replyview on HN

> I would say that the project actively expects you to be downloading them to fill any missing gaps you might have.

Where did you get this perspective from?

> I thought pi and its tools were supposed to be minimal and extensible. So why is a subagent extension bundling six agents I never asked for that I can’t disable or remove?

Why do you think a random subagents extension is under the same philosophy as pi?

Your blog post says little about pi proper, it's essentially concerned with issues you had with the ecosystem of extensions, often made by random people who either do or do not get the philosophy? Why would that be up to pi to enforce?


Replies

the_mitsuhikotoday at 7:34 AM

Sharing extensions is very much the philosophy. Using them however is less so.

Pi ships with docs that include extensions and the agent looks there for inspiration if you ask it to build a custom extension.

Looking at what others publish is useful!