logoalt Hacker News

mystralineyesterday at 3:04 PM1 replyview on HN

They should be held legally culpable for libellous claims they make.

I dont care if their pre-LLM ai says "thingy bad". They are responsible for the scripts or black boxes they control. I dont care if they dont give a reason.

Claiming bad/malicious/etc site is 100% libel. And doubly so, anybody who has been forced to agree to a ToS with binding arbitration should have it removed for libel.


Replies

otterleyyesterday at 3:13 PM

> Claiming bad/malicious/etc site is 100% libel.

No it isn't. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defamation

Please, use words correctly.

show 1 reply