logoalt Hacker News

hopechongyesterday at 6:06 PM2 repliesview on HN

We've been seeing a lot of people run OpenClaw directly on their main machine, which is a bad idea for a few reasons: it needs broad system access, it's noisy on resources, and if something goes wrong you want a clean blast radius. The obvious answer is "just isolate it," but isolation has real friction. You need to provision a machine, handle SSH keys, configure security groups, and remember to tear things down so you're not leaking money. This post walks through the three realistic options:

Docker – lowest friction, but shares your kernel and has limits depending on what OpenClaw needs to do Dedicated hardware – best isolation, but you're paying 24/7 and it takes time to set up Cloud VM – the sweet spot for most people: true isolation, pay-per-use, tear it down when you're done

For the cloud VM path, we show how to launch a hardened OpenClaw environment on AWS, GCP, Azure, or any other cloud with a single command, handling provisioning, SSH, and auto-teardown for you.


Replies

markb139yesterday at 6:32 PM

It seems to be perfectly happy to run on virtual box with a Debian install. The host pc is running a local model. I’m quite impressed with what it’s capable of.

croesyesterday at 6:29 PM

That’s only half of the problem.

People give OpenClaw access to their online services like mails where it can also do damage.

A hardened environment doesn’t prevent those kind of damage

show 3 replies